Long-term support of COVID-19 patients with veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: Complications, predictors of mortality and long-term outcome

Objectives: Treatment of severe respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to COVID-19 by veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) had a mortality of up to 70% in Germany. Many patients with COVID-19 need VV-ECMO support longer than 28 days (long-term VV-ECMO). Evidence on mortality, complications during intensive care, functional status after discharge and mortality-predictors for patients supported with long-term VV-ECMO is lacking. Method(s): Retrospective study of 137 consecutive patients treated with VV-ECMO for ARDS due to COVID-19 at University Hospital Regensburg from March 2020 to March 2022. Result(s): 38% (n=52;87% male) of patients needed longterm VV-ECMO support. In these, SOFA score (median [IQR]) at ECMO initiation was 9 [8-11], age 58.2 [50.6- 62.5] years, PaO2/FiO2-ratio 67 [52-88] mmHg, pCO262 [52-74] mmHg, Murray-Score 3.3 [3.0-3.6] and PEEP 15 [13 - 16] cmH2O. Duration of long-term support was 45 [35-65] days. 26 (50%) patients were discharged from the ICU. Only one patient died after hospital discharge. At VVECMO initiation, baseline characteristics did not differ between deceased and survivors. Complications were frequent (acute kidney injury: 31/52, renal replacement therapy: 14/52, pulmonary embolism: 21/52, intracranial hemorrhage 8/52, major bleeding 34/52 and secondary sclerosing cholangitis: 5/52) and more frequent in the deceased. Karnofsky index (normal 100) after rehabilitation was 70 [57.5-82.5]. Twelve of the 18 patients discharged from rehabilitation had a satisfactory quality of life according to their own subjective assessment. Four patients required nursing support. Mortality-predictors within the first 30 days on VV-ECMO only observed in those who deceased later, were: Bilirubin >5mg/dl for > 7 days, pulmonary compliance <10ml/mbar for >14 days, and repeated serum concentrations of interleukin 8 >150ng/L. Conclusion(s): Long-term extracorporeal lung support in patients with COVID-19 resulted in 50 % survival and subsequently lead to a satisfactory quality of life and functionality in the majority of patients. It should preferably be performed in experienced centers because of a high incidence of complications. Several findings during the early course were associated with late mortality but need validation in large prospective studies.

COVID-19-Related Encephalitis in a Child with PIK3CD Defect

Introduction: COVID-19 related encephalitis has been reported in pediatric patients;however, there are no reports in patients with inborn errors of immunity (IEI). Activated PI3K Delta Syndrome (APDS) is a disease of immune dysregulation with immunodeficiency, autoimmunity, and abnormal lymphoproliferation resulting from autosomal dominant gain-offunction variants in PIK3CD or PIK3R1 genes. We investigate a family with APDS, one mother and three children, one of whom developed COVID-19 related encephalitis. Method(s): Patients were consented to an IRB-approved protocol at our institution. Medical records and detailed immunophenotyping were reviewed. Family members were sequenced for IEI with a targeted gene panel. Result(s): The index case is a 10-year-old female with a known pathogenic variant in PIK3CD (c.3061 G > A, p.Glu1021Lys), who contracted SARS-COV-2 despite one COVID-19 vaccination in the series. Her disease course included COVID-related encephalitis with cerebellitis and compression of the pons, resulting in lasting truncal ataxia and cerebellar mutism. At that time, the patient was not on immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IgRT), but was receiving Sirolimus. Besides the index case, 3 family members (2 brothers, 1 mother) also share the same PIK3CD variant with variable clinical and immunological phenotypes. All children exhibited high transitional B-cells, consistent with developmental block to follicular B cell stage. Increased non-class switched IgM+ memory B cells and skewing towards CD21lo B cell subset, which is considered autoreactive-like, was observed in all patients. Of note, the patient had low plasmablasts, but normal immunoglobulins. Of her family members, only one was receiving both sirolimus and IgRT. Conclusion(s): We describe a rare case of COVID-19-related encephalitis in a patient with inborn error of immunity while not on IgRT. This may indicate infection susceptibility because of a lack of sufficient immunity to SARS-CoV-2, unlike the rest of her family with the same PIK3CD variant.Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc.

The ProtekDuo in ECMO configuration for ARDS secondary to COVID-19 - a systematic review

Objectives: Assessment of the literature on the ProtekDuo cannula when used as venopulmonary (V-P) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in ARDS secondary to COVID-19. Method(s): Systematic literature search in EMBASE, Medline (Pubmed) and NHS library using appropriate keywords as well as PICOS and PRISMA approach. Result(s): We found 285 publications, of which 5 publications met the search criteria and were included in this review. A total of 194 patients with COVID-19 related ARDS had a ProtekDuo placed to establish venovenous (V-V) ECMO and right ventricular (RV) support. Patients treated with the ProtekDuo cannula had survival rates between between the studies of 59 and 89%, with a significant survival compared to an invasive ventilation group or when compared to dual site V-V ECMO or other double lumen ECMO cannulas. One of the studies focused on extubation and early discontinuation of ventilator support, which the authors achieved in 100% of ProtekDuo patients. The incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) and use of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) was significantly reduced in the ProtekDuo versus other groups. Conclusion(s): The ProtekDuo displayed lower mortality rates, AKI occurrence and CRRT need as compared to other respiratory support modalities and has shown to be a game changer for ECMO support in patients suffering from COVID-19 ARDS. Many authors suggested the ProtekDuo for first line use in these patients.

Current status of tobacco use, cessation and control policy in Korea.

Background: Tobacco use is a leading cause of countless deaths and disabilities worldwide. An estimated 11 million Korean adults were still using tobacco in 2020, according to the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. This review aims to explain the current trends in tobacco use, sales, cessation, and control policies in South Korea. Current Concepts: Heated tobacco products (HTPs), a hybrid between conventional and electronic cigarettes, were first launched in South Korea in June 2017. Advertisements stating that HTPs are odorless, tar-free, and less harmful to health have caused sales of HTPs to grow quickly over the past 5 years, such that they account for about 15% of the total tobacco market. According to national smoking rate statistics and tobacco sales trends, declines in current smoking rates have slowed and even risen in some groups, and declines in total tobacco sales have slowed but also risen again during the coronavirus 19 pandemic. In addition, the number of visitors to smoking cessation clinics decreased just after the advent of HTPs and social distancing policies triggered by the coronavirus. Nicotine replacement therapy can serve as a drug therapy for smoking cessation, or bupropion and varenicline can be prescribed. Korea's representative tobacco control policies include the tax increase policy, non-smoking area policy, cigarette pack warning picture policy, and support policy for visiting smoking cessation clinics. Discussion and Conclusion(s): There is a pressing need to reflect tobacco control policies in line with changes in tobacco user behaviors and tobacco company marketing strategies.Copyright © Korean Medical Association.

Use of novel oxygenated right ventricular assist device hybrid ECLS for adolescents with refractory hypoxemic respiratory dailure due to Covid-19 pneumonia

Objectives: To describe institutional experience using Oxygenated Right Ventricular Assist Device (OxyRVAD) Hybrid ECLS for adolescents with respiratory failure due to SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. Method(s): Between September and December 2021, 44 Covid-19+ patients were admitted to our regional Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU), including 4 adolescents who required Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) due to refractory hypoxemia. Two patients were initially cannulated onto Veno-Venous (VV) ECLS and converted to Oxy-RVAD ECLS due to refractory hypoxemia;the others were cannulated directly onto Oxy-RVAD ECLS. Two patients had observed right ventricular (RV) dysfunction or failure on echocardiography. Cannulations were performed in the cardiac catheterization suite by an interventional cardiologist using percutaneous technique under fluoroscopy. Circuit construction was varied and included the use of a dedicated RVAD cannula or standard cannula used for VA/VV ECLS. All patients were connected to Cardiohelp systems with built in centrifugal pumps and oxygenators. Result(s): Two patients were initially placed on VV-ECLS and converted to Oxy-RVAD ECLS days into their course due to severe, refractory hypoxemia with one having improvement in hypoxemia after the conversion. Two patients received renal replacement therapy (RRT) without complications, the others did not have indications for renal support. Two patients underwent tracheostomy on ECMO though none were able to separate from mechanical ventilation. Three patients survived to discharge. No incidents of circuit air or clotting were noted. The patient with the longest ECLS run required one circuit change and was the only patient to develop a superinfection: a successfully-treated fungal infection. All patients were mobilized on ECLS to sitting in a chair;one was able to ambulate. Conclusion(s): Oxy-RVAD hybrid ECLS can be used to effectively support adolescents with severe respiratory disease from conditions associated with RV dysfunction. Pediatric providers can collaborate with adult critical care colleagues to use novel methods to support these patients. RRT can also be used with this circuit. While more experience and data on this modality is needed, Oxy-RVAD ECLS should be considered in patients with severe RV dysfunction and associated refractory hypoxemia. (Figure Presented).

CytoSorb on the Septic Shock

Background: Septic shock, defined as organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection, is a condition associated with high morbidity and mortality. One of the hallmarks of sepsis is the excessive release of cytokines and other inflammatory mediators that cause septic shock and multi-organ failure (MOF). New adsorbents are now available as adjuvant therapy aimed at modulating the cytokine "storm" in sepsis. They are thought to be useful if adopted early (within 8-24 hours of the diagnosis of septic shock) in patients who are unresponsive to standard therapy. Here we report our experience with CytoSorb. Method(s): From January 2021 to May 2022, 46 patients with septic shock were treated with continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) associated with hemoadsorption with CytoSorb. All cases presented organ failure including AKI. Surgical patients (n = 13) were treated with surgery, COVID patients (n = 15) and medical patients (n = 16) with medical therapy;all surgery cases were operated on before starting the haemadsorption and in some cases reoperation with the need to suspend the adsorption. The mean age was 69 +/- 17 years (SD). On admission the mean SAPSII score was 50 +/- 11 (SD). CRRT as hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) was performed. All patients received at least one CytoSorb treatment and additional treatments (up to 21 filters in a Covid patient) according to our indication. The CytoSorb cartridge was installed in series to the high cut-off filter;blood flow rates were maintained between 120 and 150 mL/min while dialysis doses from 18 to 45 mL/kg/hour. CytoSorb was renewed every 24 hours. We evaluated the impact of CytoSorb on 30-day survival, haemodynamics and relevant outcomes. Result(s): The 30-day survival was 30%. During treatment with CytoSorb, patients had a hemodynamic stabilization with a significant improvement in MAP, a reduction in amines and a decrease in PCR and PCT (Figure 1). Mortality at 30 days among medical patients was almost comparable to that of COVID patients and higher than that of surgical patients (70%, 69% and 61%, respectively). It should be noted that almost half of the deceased patients arrived late in the hospital, thus leading to a late start of treatment. Conclusion(s): We confirm the efficacy and usefulness of the CytoSorb if adopted early in patients who do not respond to standard therapy. CytoSorb treatment was safe and well tolerated with no device-related adverse events during or after treatment sessions.

Blood purification treatment and cytokine removal using Cytosorb device in critically ill patients with COVID-19 infection

Introduction: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a complication of SARS-CoV-2 disease, associated with worse clinical outcomes. Renal replacement therapy (RRT) in combination with sequential extracorporeal blood purification therapies (EBPT) might support renal function, attenuate systemic inflammation, and prevent or mitigate multiple organ dysfunctions. Method(s): We retrospectively analyzed 20 patients admitted in ICU for ARDS and who developed moderate-to-severe AKI requiring RRT. Cytokine hemadsorption with Cytosorb was performed in association with CRRT. The main indication for this treatment was the worsening of hemodynamic and respiratory conditions and suspicion of cytokine storm. The protocol consisted in the use of 3-4 cartridges in total;among these, the first 2 were changed after 12 hours of treatment to maximize cytokine removal, while the others after 24 hours. We examined comorbidities, clinical and laboratory characteristics and the impact of treatment in terms of mortality rate and changes in data before and after treatment. Result(s): Nineteen patients (95%) had an AKI at any time during their ICU stay. Of these, 5 patients (25%) had AKI stage II and 14 patients (70%) had AKI stage III. All patients included in this subgroup were mechanical ventilated and required vasopressor's use. Mean prescribed CRRT dose was 31.2 +/- 11.7 ml/kg/h. The median time to strating RRT after ICU admission was 7 days (IQR 3.5-15 days) and the median duration was 7 days (IQR 2.5-12.5 days). Mean SOFA score at the time of RRT start was extremely high (14.5 +/- 2.8). Mortality rate was important (18 patients, 90%) in our cohort. Comparing clinical and laboratory data before and after treatment, a significant improvement of inflammatory markers was reported, with the reduction of C-reactive protein (CRP, 143 [62.1- 328.5] vs 83.5 [66.7-153.5] mg/L);however, no significant changes in IL-6, WBC and PCT values were observed. A slight increase of PaO2/FiO2 were described, although not statistically significant (PaO2/FiO2 ratio 144 [82.7-174.2] vs 183 [132-355.5] mmHg). Conclusion(s): Our experience supports the need of an adequate timing for the use of Cytosorb in critically ill patients with Covid-19. Although a discrete efficacy in improving inflammatory cascade, the late use of EBPT, when organ dysfunction was already ongoing, didn't impact survival.

The use of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in COVID-19: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes

Objectives: The objective of this study is to assess the clinical benefits and potential risks of using venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) as a treatment for COVID-19 patients with severe respiratory failure. Method(s): Relevant studies were identified through searches of electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, from January 2020 to December 2022. We included observational studies on adult patients who received venovenous (VV) ECMO support for COVID-19-induced ARDS. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, 3-month mortality, and complications associated with VV ECMO. Statistical analysis was performed using R version 4.0.3 and the metafor and meta packages. Result(s): The final analysis included 39 studies comprising 10,702 patients. In-hospital mortality for adults receiving ECMO was 34.2% (95% CI: 28.5% - 40.3%;I2 = 93%), while the 3-month mortality rate was 50.2% (95% CI: 44.4% - 56.0%;I2 = 51%). Bleeding requiring transfusion occurred in 33.7% of patients (95% CI, 23.9 - 45.1;I2 = 96%). The pooled estimates for other complications were as follows: overall thromboembolic events 40.9% (95% CI, 24.8 - 59.3;I2 = 97%), stroke 8.7% (95% CI, 5.7 - 13.2;I2 = 72%), deep vein thrombosis 15.4% (95% CI, 9.7 - 23.6;I2 = 80%), pulmonary embolism 15.6% (95% CI, 9.3 - 25.1;I2 = 92%), gastrointestinal haemorrhage 8.1% (95% CI, 5.5 - 11.8;I2 = 56%), and the need for any renal replacement therapy in 38.0% of patients (95% CI, 31.6 - 44.8;I2 = 84%). Bacterial pneumonia occurred in 46.4% of patients (95% CI, 32.5 - 61.0;I2 = 96%). Conclusion(s): Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) may be an effective treatment option for COVID-19 patients with severe respiratory failure. The use of VV ECMO was associated with reduced in-hospital and 3-month mortality. However, bleeding is a common complication that should be closely monitored. Further research is needed to determine the optimal use of VV ECMO in this patient population and to identify factors that may predict a favourable response to treatment.

Immunoglobulin replacement products in current clinical use in the United States have poor neutralizing activity against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron strains

Background: Intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) Immunoglobulin G (IG) replacement products are in wide use in patients with primary antibody deficiency syndrome (PAD). There is limited data on the levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies in IG products or their ability to neutralize emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants. There is lack of data on the impact of IG therapy on serum anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike or neutralizing antibody titers in PAD patients. Method(s): We measured anti-SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike antibody levels and neutralizing titers against historical (WA1/2020) and variant (B.1.617.2 [Delta] and BA.1 [Omicron]) strains in 158 lots of 6 different IG products, collected between August 2021 to April 2022 and manufactured between December 2019 to December 2021. IG products were compared to serum from 20 healthy donors vaccinated with 2 doses of Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccine. Serum anti-spike antibody level and SARS-CoV-2 neutralization activity were measured in 27 PAD patients treated with the tested IG products. Result(s): Anti-spike antibody titers started to increase in products manufactured in March 2021 and reached peak level, comparable to vaccinated healthy donors, in products manufactured in August 2021 (Fig. 1). The neutralization activity against WA1/2020 and Delta strains showed a similar pattern (Fig. 2). However, 95% of the tested products had no neutralization activity against Omicron. Until November 2021, IVIG products infused to patients in the study had anti-spike titers comparable to unvaccinated healthy donors (Fig. 3). Beginning in February 2022, IVIG products had anti-spike titers comparable to vaccinated healthy controls. Concurrent with a rise in anti-spike antibodies in IG products, PAD patients showed an increase in serum levels of anti-spike antibody and neutralizing activity against WA1/202 and Delta but not against Omicron variants. Testing of immunoglobulin replacement products neutralization activity against emerging variants BQ.1 and BQ.1.1 is underway.[Formula presented][Formula presented][Formula presented] Conclusion(s): The anti-SARS spike antibody and neutralization activity of IVIG products lags after the emergence of COVID-19 variants and currently have poor activity against Omicron strain. Because of the protracted manufacturing process, this is expected to be an ongoing challenge. As variants emerge, clinicians should consider additional means of protection for PAD patients such as vaccination, or prophylaxis with monoclonal antibodies.Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc.

Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Revascularization During Current Pandemics, New Hope! - Our Experience in a Third World Country

Objective: Since the last decade, the notion of minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) has gained worldwide rapid popularity. Bangladesh is not far from mastering this technique due to the increasing interest of both patients and surgeons. Meanwhile, during this COVID-19 era could it help patients, remains the main question. In this context, we have operated on a total of 523 patients from October 2020 to November 2021 including, 89 patients who were MICS and among them, 17 were coronary artery bypass grafting. Method(s): We have included all patients who underwent minimally invasive coronary artery surgery in our hospital from October 2020 to November 2021 irrespective of single (MIDCAB) / multi-vessel disease (MICAS) or combined valve replacement with coronary revascularization. Data were collected from the hospital database, telephone conversations, and direct clinic visits. All data were analyzed statistically and expressed in the form of tables. Result(s): In the last 14 months of pandemics we have operated on a total of 89 MICS patients, among them 10 were Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass (MIDCAB), 6 were double or triple vessels coronary artery surgery (MICAS), 1 patient underwent upper-mini aortic valve replacement along with coronary revascularization. One of our patients needed re-exploration for chest wall bleeding on the same day. Mean ICU and hospital stay in our series were less than conventional revascularization. There was no in-hospital or 30 days' mortality in our series. Conclusion(s): Cardiac surgery these days is headed toward less invasive approaches with the aid of technology, advanced instruments, and pioneer's lead. But from our in-hospital results we conclude that by avoiding median sternotomy, these minimal invasive revascularization techniques can provide hope to the patients by alleviating symptoms with restored vascularity, reduced morbidity, preventing sudden cardiac death. Health costs reduction with shorter hospital and ICU stay are the added benefits.

Hemoadsorption by CytoSorb in septic no-Covid and Covid patients: a case series

Background: Septic shock is a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. The reduction of pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory mediators by hemoadsorption represents a new tool in the treatment of sepsis. In the present case series, we evaluated the impact of CytoSorb on adult patients with septic shock. Method(s): Patients with septic shock, admitted to Intensive Care Unit (ICU) from March 1, 2021 to February 28, 2022 who received CytoSorb therapy within 72 hours of admission were enrolled in the study. The severity of clinical conditions at admission was assessed by the SAPS II and SOFA scores;The magnitude of the inflammatory response was estimated using the plasmatic levels of C reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6). The effect of CytoSorb therapy on the inflammatory state, was evaluated measuring the percentage reduction of IL-6 and CRP. Time elapsed from ICU admission and the start of CytoSorb therapy was also assessed. T-test was used to compare the means of the groups of Survivors and No survivors. Fisher's test was used to evaluated the difference in mortality between Covid and No covid patients. Result(s): Twelve patients were evaluated. Six patients tested positive for covid-19, while the other six did not. Table 1 shows the values of age, SAPSII, SOFA, IL-6, CRP, PCT and timing between the survivors and the no survivors. Overall, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of SAPSII, SOFA, age, CRP. There was a significant difference in the timing of Cytosorb start and percentage of IL-6 removal: In surviving patients the timing of intervention was shorter (3,3+/-1,8 vs 23,5+/-18,9 hours) than in non- survivors. The IL-6 removal rate was significantly higher in the survivor group (70,8+/-15,87 vs 33,2+/-12,26). Conclusion(s): In survivors the timing of CytoSorb therapy was shorter and the IL-6 removal rate was higher than in non-survivors. This suggest that the early applying of CytoSorb adsorber in combination with Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy (CRRT) techniques, could increase the survival rate of septic shock patients. Using CytoSorb was safe and well tolerated with no device-related adverse events during or after the treatment.

Vulnerability and antimicrobial resistance

It is now well-recognised that antimicrobial resistance (AMR), or the ability of organisms to resist currently available antibiotics and other antimicrobial drugs, represents one of the greatest dangers to human health in the 21st Century. As of 2022, AMR is a top-10 global public health threat. Various national and transnational initiatives have been implemented to address accelerating AMR, and the pressure to find local and global solutions is increasing. Despite this urgency, surprisingly limited progress is being made in rolling back or even slowing resistance. A multitude of perspectives exist regarding why this is the case. Key concerns include an enduring dependency on market-driven drug development, the lacklustre governance and habitual over-prescribing of remaining antimicrobial resources, and rampant short-termism across societies. While rarely presented in such terms, these disparate issues all speak to the social production of vulnerability. Yet vulnerability is rarely discussed in the AMR literature, except in terms of 'disproportionate effects' of AMR. In this paper, we offer a reconceptualisation of vulnerability as manifest in the AMR scene, showing that vulnerability is both a predictable consequence of AMR and, critically, productive of AMR to begin with. We underline why comprehending vulnerability as embodied, assembled, multivalent and reproduced through surveillance matters for international efforts to combat resistance.Copyright © 2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

ECMO in acute fulminant myocarditis in pediatrics

Objectives: To describe our experience in ECMO for acute myocarditis Methods: Descriptive, retrospective study (2018-2022) of a cohort of 8 patients < 16 years with acute myocarditis who were assisted on ECMO. Result(s): 8 patients were collected, (6 females), with a mean age 7;8 years [range 0;1-13;8]. In 7/8, the reason for cannulation was hemodynamic instability refractory to medical treatment, with a mean inotropic score of 70 [range 10-122]. Sixty-two percent presented cardiorespiratory arrest prior to cannulation and 2 of them needed ECRP. The mean precannulation troponin level was 1498 ng/ml [range 89-6212]. Primary transport was performed in 4 patients. ECMO was peripheral veno-arterial in 100%, jugulo-carotid in 2/8 and femoro-femoral in 6/8. All patients underwent atrioseptostomy. They received treatment with levosimendan, immunoglobulins, corticoids and carnitine. In 4 acute infectious etiology was confirmed (parvovirus, influenza and SARSCoV2), another one was due to PIMS-TS and in 3 no etiology was found. Six patients underwent myocardial biopsy and 5 of them showed inflammatory infiltrates. The mean time on ECMO was 8 days [range 3-14], 2 of them requiring 2 ECMO courses. The mean length of PICU stay was 21 days [range 10-50]. Two were transferred to a heart transplant center. The main complications were arterial hypertension (88%), bleeding (63%), neurological (50%), arrhythmias (38%), coagulopathy (38%) and infectious (38%). One patient required renal replacement therapy. 1 patient died, 2 had moderate neurological sequels. Conclusion(s): ECMO is a therapeutic option in patients with fulminant myocarditis refractory to medical treatment and may help improve their prognosis.

ECMO for the immunocompromised pediatric patient: Our experience

Objectives: To present a series of immunosuppressed patients (oncohematological disease, congenital immunosuppression, hematopoietic stem cell (HSCT), and solid organ transplant) assisted on ECMO. Method(s): Descriptive, retrospective study (2011-2020) of a cohort of 9 immunosuppressed patients, supported on ECMO. Medical records were reviewed and demographic, clinical, and analytical variables were collected. Result(s): In our series of 9 patients, 5 were male, the median age was 8 years [RIC 3-11 years]. Considering the underlying disease, 6 were oncologic, 1 liver transplant and 2 with congenital immunodeficiency after HSCT. 4 were under active chemotherapy (median 6 days after the last cycle [RIC 5-188]). 6 were admitted due to acute respiratory failure, 3 due to hemodynamic instability (3/9), (one septic shock). The median PEEP was 12 [RIC 9-15] and FiO2 100% (81-100%). 78% (6) required vasoactive drugs (median inotropic score 35 [RIC 0-75]. 40%. 5 had severe neutropenia and/or plateletopenia in the 24 hours prior to ECMO, and alterations in acid-base balance (median pH 7. 1 [RIC 6.9-7.15]. 5 were on multiorgan failure. TPrimary ECMO transport was performed in 4 patients (44%). Cannulation was peripheral in 80% (57% cervical, 43% femoral) and central in 20%;70% VA-ECMO. Median time of assistance was 15 days [RIC 3.5-31.5] in cardiac ECMO (4), and 29 days [RIC 13.5-42] and in pulmonary ECMO (n=5). The median total time of admission was 45 days [RIC 27-59]. 9 had an infection, 2 COVID after HSCT, and 8 bleeding complications, but only one required surgical revision. Renal replacement therapy was used in 5 (median 9 days [RIC 5-34.5]). Other therapies used were polymyxin hemadsorption(2), intratracheal surfactant(2), plasma exchange(1), infusion of mesenchymal cells(1) and specific memory T lymphocytes(2). 4 patients died, 5 survived decannulation, 2 died later, with an overall survival rate to hospital discharge of 33% (3/9). Conclusion(s): Despite having a worse prognosis, ECMO can increase survival in immunosuppressed patients, in situations that are challenging and require a multidisciplinary approach.

Characteristics, management and outcomes of thirty COVID-19 ARDS patients supported with veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation at Rikshospitalet, Oslo University Hospital

Background: We reviewed patients with COVID-19 ARDS managed with VV-ECMO support at our center from March 2020 until February 2022. Material(s) and Method(s): We extracted data from electronic health records (Metavision and DIPS). We registered premorbid health status, ventilator-settings before initiation of ECMO, the time-course, and hospital mortality. Result(s): Thirty patients were managed at our hospital, with a median age of 57.2 years (28-65) and median BMI 28 (22-40). No patient had any serious comorbidity. Twenty-two patients received non-invasive ventilation prior to intubation (1-10 days). The median time on ventilator were 8.0 days (1-19) prior to ECMO and median tidal volume was 5.8 mL/kg PBW (3.1-7.5). Hypoxemia (median PaO2-FiO2 ratio 8 kPa, range 6-12 kPa) and hypercapnia (median PaCO2 11.9 kPa, range 4.2-18.5) [SEP1] despite lung protective ventilation were the main indications for VV-ECMO. Two patients had severe respiratory acidosis without hypoxemia. 18 patients developed serious complications while managed with ECMO (acute renal failure, clinically significant bleeding, sepsis, right ventricular heart failure, dislocation of cannulae). Seven patients received renal replacement therapy. Sixteen patients (53%) died. Thirteen patients (43%) died on ECMO, three (10%) after weaning, Twelve (40%) were discharged from hospital, two are currently in ICU (7%). The median duration of ECMO and ventilator treatment, was 27 (6-50) and 37 (9-78) days, respectively. Conclusion(s): Management of patients with COVID-19 ARDS with VV-ECMO is very resource-intensive, and accompanied by serious complications and high mortality. In-hospital mortality in our cohort was 53%, which is comparable with reports from other centers. However, the duration of ECMO, and pre-ECMO mechanical ventilation, were longer than typically reported.

The Association between COVID-19 Infection and Kidney Damage in a Regional University Hospital.

Background and Objectives: Kidneys are one of the main targets for SARS-CoV-2. Early recognition and precautionary management are essential in COVID-19 patients due to the multiple origins of acute kidney injury and the complexity of chronic kidney disease management. The aims of this research were to investigate the association between COVID-19 infection and renal injury in a regional hospital. Materials and Methods: The data of 601 patients from the Vilnius regional university hospital between 1 January 2020 and 31 March 2021 were collected for this cross-sectional study. Demographic data (gender, age), clinical outcomes (discharge, transfer to another hospital, death), length of stay, diagnoses (chronic kidney disease, acute kidney injury), and laboratory test data (creatinine, urea, C-reactive protein, potassium concentrations) were collected and analyzed statistically. Results: Patients discharged from the hospital were younger (63.18 ± 16.02) than those from the emergency room (75.35 ± 12.41, p < 0.001), transferred to another hospital (72.89 ± 12.06, p = 0.002), or who died (70.87 ± 12.83, p < 0.001). Subsequently, patients who died had lower creatinine levels on the first day than those who survived (185.00 vs. 311.17 µmol/L, p < 0.001), and their hospital stay was longer (Spearman's correlation coefficient = -0.304, p < 0.001). Patients with chronic kidney disease had higher first-day creatinine concentration than patients with acute kidney injury (365.72 ± 311.93 vs. 137.58 ± 93.75, p < 0.001). Patients with acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease complicated by acute kidney injury died 7.81 and 3.66 times (p < 0.001) more often than patients with chronic kidney disease alone. The mortality rate among patients with acute kidney injury was 7.79 (p < 0.001) times higher than among patients without these diseases. Conclusions: COVID-19 patients who developed acute kidney injury and whose chronic kidney disease was complicated by acute kidney injury had a longer hospital stay and were more likely to die.

Safety and timeliness of telemedicine initiation of continuous kidney replacement therapy.

BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, some continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT) initiations were transitioned to telemedicine to improve the timeliness of initiation, and minimize COVID-19 transmission. While telemedicine would appear acceptable for many clinical settings, safety and timeliness of telemedicine CKRT initiation is undescribed. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients on CKRT from January 2021-September 2022. Information on patient characteristics and CKRT therapy was extracted from the electronic health record. Multidisciplinary team provider attitudes and perspectives were assessed using survey. RESULTS: During the study period, there were 101 CKRT circuit initiations in patients not previously receiving CKRT, with 33% (33/101) initiated by telemedicine. There were no differences in patient characteristics, including age, weight at initiation, severity of illness, nor degree of fluid overload between the in-person and telemedicine initiation cohorts. CKRT telemedicine initiations were timelier, occurring on average 3.0 h after decision to initiate therapy compared to 5.8 h for all in-person CKRT starts (p < 0.001) and 5.5 h for night and weekend in-person starts (p < 0.001). Complications did not differ between telemedicine and in-person starts (15% vs. 15%, p = 0.99) and initial circuit life was similar. There were no differences in likelihood of death or duration of CKRT therapy. Telemedicine initiations were widely acceptable to multidisciplinary providers. CONCLUSION: In appropriately selected patients, telemedicine initiation of CKRT is a timely and safe option. Further standardization of telemedicine initiation of CKRT should be considered to improve the timely delivery of CKRT and may improve nephrology workforce wellness. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.

Dialysis Patient Experiences During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Survey Study.

Rationale & Objective: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic imposed several changes in the care of patients with kidney failure receiving dialysis. We explored patient care experiences during the pandemic. Study Design: The study team verbally administered surveys including Likert scale multiple-choice questions and open-ended questions and recorded responses. Setting & Participants: Surveys were administered to adults receiving dialysis through an academic nephrology practice after the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Exposure: Outpatient dialysis treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic. Outcomes: Perceptions of care and changes in health. Analytical Approach: Multiple-choice responses were quantified using descriptive statistics. Thematic analysis was used to code open-ended responses and derive themes surrounding patient experiences. Results: A total of 172 patients receiving dialysis were surveyed. Most patients reported feeling "very connected" to the care teams. Seventeen percent of participants reported transportation issues, 6% reported difficulty obtaining medications, and 9% reported difficulty getting groceries. Four themes emerged as influencing patient experiences during the pandemic: 1) the COVID-19 pandemic did not significantly affect participants' experience of dialysis care; 2) the COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted other aspects of participants' lives, which in turn were felt to affect mental and physical health; 3) regarding dialysis care experience more generally, participants valued consistency, dependability, and personal connection to staff; and 4) the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the importance of external social support. Limitations: Surveys were administered early in the COVID-19 pandemic, and patient perspectives have not been reassessed. Further qualitative analysis using semi-structured interviews was not performed. Survey distribution in additional practice settings, using validated questionnaires, would increase generalizability of the study. The study was not powered for statistical analysis. Conclusions: Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, perceptions of dialysis care were unchanged for most patients. Other aspects of participants' lives were impacted, which affected their health. Subpopulations of patients receiving dialysis may be more vulnerable during the pandemic: those with histories of mental health conditions, non-White patients, and patients treated by in-center hemodialysis. Plain-language summary: Patients with kidney failure continue to receive life-sustaining dialysis treatments during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. We sought to understand perceived changes in care and mental health during this challenging time. We administered surveys to patients receiving dialysis after the initial wave of COVID-19, asking questions on topics including access to care, ability to reach care teams, and depression. Most participants did not feel that their dialysis care experiences had changed, but some reported difficulties in other aspects of living such as nutrition and social interactions. Participants highlighted the importance of consistent dialysis care teams and the availability of external support. We found that patients who are treated with in-center hemodialysis, are non-White, or have mental health conditions may have been more vulnerable during the pandemic.

Increasing SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence among UK pediatric patients on dialysis and kidney transplantation between January 2020 and August 2021.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was officially declared a pandemic by the World Health Organisation (WHO) on 11 March 2020, as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spread rapidly across the world. We investigated the seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in pediatric patients on dialysis or kidney transplantation in the UK. METHODS: Excess sera samples were obtained prospectively during outpatient visits or haemodialysis sessions and analysed using a custom immunoassay calibrated with population age-matched healthy controls. Two large pediatric centres contributed samples. RESULTS: In total, 520 sera from 145 patients (16 peritoneal dialysis, 16 haemodialysis, 113 transplantation) were analysed cross-sectionally from January 2020 until August 2021. No anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody positive samples were detected in 2020 when lockdown and enhanced social distancing measures were enacted. Thereafter, the proportion of positive samples increased from 5% (January 2021) to 32% (August 2021) following the emergence of the Alpha variant. Taking all patients, 32/145 (22%) were seropositive, including 8/32 (25%) with prior laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and 12/32 (38%) post-vaccination (one of whom was also infected after vaccination). The remaining 13 (41%) seropositive patients had no known stimulus, representing subclinical cases. Antibody binding signals were comparable across patient ages and dialysis versus transplantation and highest against full-length spike protein versus spike subunit-1 and nucleocapsid protein. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence was low in 2020 and increased in early 2021. Serological surveillance complements nucleic acid detection and antigen testing to build a greater picture of the epidemiology of COVID-19 and is therefore important to guide public health responses. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.